A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted countrywide focus adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their spouse and children residence. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of established inhabitants. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in the delicate coastal atmosphere which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially designed, is in the proper posture. Their legal staff has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another very long after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately Accountant Paul Feely be altered, eradicated, or done as planned will depend on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.